{"id":805,"date":"2020-12-05T20:54:31","date_gmt":"2020-12-05T13:54:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/international.binus.ac.id\/information-system\/?p=805"},"modified":"2020-12-05T20:56:23","modified_gmt":"2020-12-05T13:56:23","slug":"rein3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/international.binus.ac.id\/information-system\/2020\/12\/05\/rein3\/","title":{"rendered":"CULTURE INFLUENCE ON HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION – Cultural Factors Toward User\u2019s Preference on Groupware Application Design"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rein Suadamara, Stefan Werner, Axel Hunger<\/h3>\n

Abstract<\/h4>\n

This paper reports about on-going research on how cultural dimensions affect user\u2019s preference in intercultural collaboration using computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) tools. It proposes how selected cultural dimensions should be applied when designing a synchronous groupware application aimed for multicultural users. Using four cultural dimensions, which are Collectivist-Individualist, Power Distance Index, Uncertainty Avoidance, and Low- and High Context communication from Hofstede, Gudykunst, Triandis, and Edward T.Hall, this research will try to analyse how culture influences the way users prefer to interact using a groupware as a remote collaboration tools.<\/p>\n

References<\/h4>\n
    \n
  1. Cagiltay, K., 1999. Culture and its effects on human computer interaction. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications.<\/li>\n
  2. Day, D., 1996. Cultural based of Interface Acceptance. Proceedings of the 11th annual European HumanComputer Interaction Conference, (People and Computers XI), 35-47.<\/li>\n
  3. Gudykunst, W.B., 1991. Bridging Differences: Effective Intergroup Communication, Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.<\/li>\n
  4. Gudykunst, W.B. & Ting-Toomey, S., 1988. Culture and Interpesonal Communication, SAGE Publications.<\/li>\n
  5. Hall, E.T., 1976. Beyond culture, New York: Doubleday.<\/li>\n
  6. Hofstede, G., 1997. Cultures and Organizations Software of the Mind. Intercultural cooperation and it importance for survival, UK: McGraw Hill.<\/li>\n
  7. Hofstede, G., 1980. Culture’s consequences: International differnces in work-related values, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.<\/li>\n
  8. Hoft, N., 1996. Developing a Cultural Model. In International User Interface. New York: John Wiley and Sons.<\/li>\n
  9. Marcus, A., 2000. Cultural Dimensions and Global Web User Interface Design: What? So What? What Now? In South African Human-Computer Interaction Conference. Available at: http:\/\/chisa.org.za\/abstracts.htm.<\/li>\n
  10. Triandis, H. et al., 1985. Allocentric vs. idiocentric tendencies. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 395-415.<\/li>\n
  11. Trompenaars, F., 1993. Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in business, London: Nicholas Brealey.<\/li>\n
  12. Vilhjalmsson, H.H., 2003. Avatar Augmented Online Conversation.<\/li>\n
  13. Werner, S., 2003. Synchrone Groupware f\u00fcr die SoftwareEngineering-Ausbildung. Germany: Universit\u00e4t Duisburg-Essen.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Download<\/a><\/p>\n

    Paper Citation<\/h4>\n

     <\/p>\n

    in Harvard Style<\/h4>\n

    Suadamara R., Werner S. and Hunger A. (2010). CULTURE INFLUENCE ON HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION – Cultural Factors Toward User\u2019s Preference on Groupware Application Design<\/b> . In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems – Volume 5: ICEIS,<\/i> ISBN 978-989-8425-08-9, pages 186-191. DOI: 10.5220\/0002972701860191<\/p>\n

    https:\/\/www.scitepress.org\/Papers\/2010\/29727\/<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Rein Suadamara, Stefan Werner, Axel Hunger Abstract This paper reports about on-going research on how cultural dimensions affect user\u2019s preference in intercultural collaboration using computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) tools. It proposes how selected cultural dimensions should be applied when designing a synchronous groupware application aimed for multicultural users. Using four cultural dimensions, which are […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-805","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-achievements"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/international.binus.ac.id\/information-system\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/805"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/international.binus.ac.id\/information-system\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/international.binus.ac.id\/information-system\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/international.binus.ac.id\/information-system\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/international.binus.ac.id\/information-system\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=805"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/international.binus.ac.id\/information-system\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/805\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":807,"href":"https:\/\/international.binus.ac.id\/information-system\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/805\/revisions\/807"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/international.binus.ac.id\/information-system\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=805"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/international.binus.ac.id\/information-system\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=805"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/international.binus.ac.id\/information-system\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=805"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}